In my post of June 27, 2015, I copied a video in which Varoufakis explained what happened in the historic Eurogroup meeting of that day. However, I forgot to include the intervention at the meeting by Varoufakis, which he put himself on his blog, "As it happened - Yanis Varoufakis' intervention during the 27th June 2015 Eurogroup Meeting", preceded by a short introduction. Here is the first part of it:
The Eurogroup Meeting of 27th June 2015
will not go down as a proud moment in Europe’s history. Ministers turned
down the Greek government’s request that the Greek people should
be granted a single week during which to deliver a Yes or No answer to
the institutions’ proposals – proposals crucial for Greece’s future in
the Eurozone. The very idea that a government would consult its people
on a problematic proposal put to it by the institutions was treated with
incomprehension and often with disdain bordering on contempt. I was
even asked: “How do you expect common people to understand such complex
issues?”. Indeed, democracy did not have a good day in yesterday’s
Eurogroup meeting! But nor did European institutions. After our request
was rejected, the Eurogroup President broke with the convention of
unanimity (issuing a statement without my consent) and even took the
dubious decision to convene a follow up meeting without the Greek
minister, ostensibly to discuss the “next steps”.
Can democracy and a monetary union
coexist? Or must one give way? This is the pivotal question that the
Eurogroup has decided to answer by placing democracy in the too-hard
basket. So far, one hopes.
Intervention by Yanis Varoufakis, 27th June 2015 Eurogroup Meeting
Colleagues,
In our last meeting (25th June) the institutions tabled
their final offer to the Greek authorities, in response to our proposal
for a Staff Level Agreement (SLA) as tabled on 22nd June (and
signed by Prime Minister Tsipras). After long, careful examination, our
government decided that, unfortunately, the institutions’ proposal
could not be accepted. In view of how close we have come to the 30th
June deadline, the date when the current loan agreement expires, this
impasse of grave concern to us all and its causes must be thoroughly
examined.
We rejected the institutions’ 25th June proposals because
of a variety of powerful reasons. The first reason is the combination of
austerity and social injustice they would impose upon a population
devastated already by… austerity and social injustice. Even our own SLA
proposal (22nd June) is austerian, in a bid to placate the
institutions and thus come closer to an agreement. Only our SLA
attempted to shift the burden of this renewed austerian onslaught to
those more able to afford it – e.g. by concentrating on increasing
employer contributions to pension funds rather than on reducing the
lowest of pensions. Nonetheless, even our SLA contains many parts that
Greek society rejects.
So, having pushed us hard to accept substantial new austerity, in the
form of absurdly large primary surpluses (3.5% of GDP over the medium
term, albeit somewhat lower than the unfathomable number agreed to by
previous Greek governments – i.e. 4.5%), we ended up having to make
recessionary trade-offs between, on the one hand, higher taxes/charges
in an economy where those who pay their dues pay through the nose and,
on the other, reductions in pensions/benefits in a society already
devastated by massive cuts in basic income support for the multiplying
needy.
Let me say colleagues ... (for remainder, see "As it happened - Yanis Varoufakis' intervention during the 27th June 2015 Eurogroup Meeting")
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment